This question is testing a framework, not a memory. Prepare any announced transaction using five beats. First, the parties: who is the acquirer, who is the target, and what does each do? Second, the strategic rationale: why does this deal make sense for the buyer, and what is the synergy thesis? Third, valuation: what multiple was paid, and how does it compare to recent sector transactions? Fourth, financing: how is the deal funded, and what does that say about the buyer's conviction? Fifth, your view: do you think the deal makes sense, and what is the key risk? That structure works for any transaction. Practice it on three different deals before your interview so you can pivot if the interviewer pivots.
Insider read
Really testing: Whether you can structure a business conversation around a real transaction. The five-beat framework signals analytical discipline and preparation depth.
The tell: Juniors describe a deal chronologically and run out of things to say. Seniors anchor on rationale, valuation, and a defended personal view.
Follow-up: What multiple did the acquirer pay, and do you think it was fair?
Say thisI look at the EV/EBITDA multiple against recent comparable transactions in the sector, then assess whether the synergies the buyer cited are realistic at that price. My view is that the deal makes sense if the synergy assumptions are conservative, but the price leaves limited margin for error.